My husband%26#039;s brother has always been somewhat of a trouble maker. He is selfish and a liar to boot. About 5 years ago, he ran off with my husband%26#039;s youngest brothers wife. It did not last long but long enough for her get pregnant. She went back to her husband (who is in a wheelchair from a wreck). They have two children together prior this incidence, and he forgave her for the children%26#039;s sake. Since he forgave her, we all accepted him back in our lives. However, around 6 months ago they were caught in the act again. My husband and I have three children and we do not approve of what he has done. We have not spoken to him since it happened and have cut him off completely. I do not want my children around the trash, and to honest, it is really embarrassing. He thinks he has done absolutely nothing wrong. Now, they are expecting another baby. I could write a book on all the other things he has done in his lifetime. Their mother thinks we are in the wrong. What did you think?
Do you think my husband and I are wrong for cutting his brother from our life?
He%26#039;s not a good influence to your children. I think your doing the right thing, by cutting him out of your life. First, though, make sure your husband approves of cutting his own brother out. If he agrees, I think you should. Well thats just me. It really depends on you, though. Hope that helps!
Reply:its UR choice if u dont want him around ur kids. I wouldnt want him around either. bsides he%26#039;s jus an uncle he aint the daddy
Reply:You need to look out for your household crazy inlaws are a no-no. You don%26#039;t need the disharmony in your life if he wants to be dysfunctional let him keep it in the streets. I say forget him he has nothing to offer your family but chaos.
performing arts network
Monday, April 13, 2009
Know any more signs?
In Honor of Stupid People
In case you needed further proof that the human race is doomed to stupidity, here are some actual label instructions on consumer goods:
On a Sears hairdryer -- Do not use while sleeping.
(Shoot, and that%26#039;s the only time I have to work on my hair.)
On a bag of Fritos -- You could be a winner! No purchase necessary. Details inside.
(the shoplifter special)?
On a bar of Dial soap -- %26quot;Directions: Use like regular soap,%26quot;
(and that would be how???....)
On some Swanson frozen dinners -- %26quot;Serving suggestion: Defrost.%26quot;
(but, it%26#039;s %26quot;just%26quot; a suggestion).
On Tesco%26#039;s Tiramisu dessert (printed on bottom) -- %26quot;Do not turn upside down.%26quot;
(well...duh, a bit late, huh)!
On Marks %26amp; Spencer Bread Pudding -- %26quot;Product will be hot after heating.%26quot;
(...and you thought????...)
On packaging for a Rowena iron -- %26quot;Do not iron clothes on body.%26quot;
(but wouldn%26#039;t this save me more time)?
On Boot%26#039;s Children Cough Medicine -- %26quot;Do not drive a car or operate machinery after taking this medication.%26quot;
(We could do a lot to reduce the rate of construction accidents if we could just get those 5-year-olds with head-colds off those forklifts.)
On Nytol Sleep Aid -- %26quot;Warning: May cause drowsiness.%26quot;
(and...I%26#039;m taking this because???....)
On most brands of Christmas lights -- %26quot;For indoor or outdoor use only.%26quot;
(as opposed to...what)?
On a Japanese food processor -- %26quot;Not to be used for the other use.%26quot;
(now, somebody out there, help me on this. I%26#039;m a bit curious)
On Sainsbury%26#039;s peanuts -- %26quot;Warning: contains nuts.%26quot;
(talk about a news flash)
On an American Airlines packet of nuts -- %26quot;Instructions: Open packet, eat nuts.%26quot;
(Step 3: maybe, ooh...fly Delta?)
On a child%26#039;s Superman costume -- %26quot;Wearing of this garment does not enable you to fly.%26quot;
(I don%26#039;t blame the company. I blame the parents for this one.)
On a Swedish chainsaw -- %26quot;Do not attempt to stop chain with your hands or genitals.%26quot;
(Oh my ..was there a lot of this happening somewhere?)
Now that you%26#039;ve smiled at least once, it%26#039;s your turn to spread the stupidity.
Know any more signs?
on the back of my Dove hairspray: dont spray in eyes
or behind the Listerene pre-rinse it says: Do not freeze!
i have to give u a star for this one, mine dsnt evn compare!
(thanx 4 the laughs!!)
Reply:haha the sad thing is someone tried this at least once that%26#039;s why they had to put a warning label on it. my fav is on a cup of mcdonalds coffee that says %26quot;Warning coffee is hot handle with care%26quot;
Reply:do not try this....professional driver on closed track
or the chick eating a 5 dollar bill....[dramatization]for a sub commercial
Reply:lol first laugh of the day..........ill be taking more notice of thing from now on
Reply:Okay... that was just awesome.. lmao.. this really just made my day. :)
God Bless You! and may ppl remain stupid so we can laugh at them. haha. just kidding!
teeth
In case you needed further proof that the human race is doomed to stupidity, here are some actual label instructions on consumer goods:
On a Sears hairdryer -- Do not use while sleeping.
(Shoot, and that%26#039;s the only time I have to work on my hair.)
On a bag of Fritos -- You could be a winner! No purchase necessary. Details inside.
(the shoplifter special)?
On a bar of Dial soap -- %26quot;Directions: Use like regular soap,%26quot;
(and that would be how???....)
On some Swanson frozen dinners -- %26quot;Serving suggestion: Defrost.%26quot;
(but, it%26#039;s %26quot;just%26quot; a suggestion).
On Tesco%26#039;s Tiramisu dessert (printed on bottom) -- %26quot;Do not turn upside down.%26quot;
(well...duh, a bit late, huh)!
On Marks %26amp; Spencer Bread Pudding -- %26quot;Product will be hot after heating.%26quot;
(...and you thought????...)
On packaging for a Rowena iron -- %26quot;Do not iron clothes on body.%26quot;
(but wouldn%26#039;t this save me more time)?
On Boot%26#039;s Children Cough Medicine -- %26quot;Do not drive a car or operate machinery after taking this medication.%26quot;
(We could do a lot to reduce the rate of construction accidents if we could just get those 5-year-olds with head-colds off those forklifts.)
On Nytol Sleep Aid -- %26quot;Warning: May cause drowsiness.%26quot;
(and...I%26#039;m taking this because???....)
On most brands of Christmas lights -- %26quot;For indoor or outdoor use only.%26quot;
(as opposed to...what)?
On a Japanese food processor -- %26quot;Not to be used for the other use.%26quot;
(now, somebody out there, help me on this. I%26#039;m a bit curious)
On Sainsbury%26#039;s peanuts -- %26quot;Warning: contains nuts.%26quot;
(talk about a news flash)
On an American Airlines packet of nuts -- %26quot;Instructions: Open packet, eat nuts.%26quot;
(Step 3: maybe, ooh...fly Delta?)
On a child%26#039;s Superman costume -- %26quot;Wearing of this garment does not enable you to fly.%26quot;
(I don%26#039;t blame the company. I blame the parents for this one.)
On a Swedish chainsaw -- %26quot;Do not attempt to stop chain with your hands or genitals.%26quot;
(Oh my ..was there a lot of this happening somewhere?)
Now that you%26#039;ve smiled at least once, it%26#039;s your turn to spread the stupidity.
Know any more signs?
on the back of my Dove hairspray: dont spray in eyes
or behind the Listerene pre-rinse it says: Do not freeze!
i have to give u a star for this one, mine dsnt evn compare!
(thanx 4 the laughs!!)
Reply:haha the sad thing is someone tried this at least once that%26#039;s why they had to put a warning label on it. my fav is on a cup of mcdonalds coffee that says %26quot;Warning coffee is hot handle with care%26quot;
Reply:do not try this....professional driver on closed track
or the chick eating a 5 dollar bill....[dramatization]for a sub commercial
Reply:lol first laugh of the day..........ill be taking more notice of thing from now on
Reply:Okay... that was just awesome.. lmao.. this really just made my day. :)
God Bless You! and may ppl remain stupid so we can laugh at them. haha. just kidding!
teeth
The Stupidity of mankind?
In case you needed further proof that the human race is doomed through stupidity, here are some actual label instructions on consumer goods.
On a Sear%26#039;s hairdryer:
....Do not use while sleeping.
(darn, and that%26#039;s the only time I have to work on my hair.)
On a bag of Fritos:
....You could be a winner! No purchase necessary. Details inside.
(the shoplifter special?)
On a bar of Dial soap:
%26quot;Directions: Use like regular soap.%26quot;
(and that would be how???....)
On some Swanson frozen dinners:
%26quot;Serving suggestion: Defrost.%26quot;
(but, it%26#039;s %26quot;just%26quot; a suggestion.)
Tesco%26#039;s Tiramisu dessert (printed on bottom):
%26quot;Do not turn upside down.%26quot;
(well...duh, a bit late, huh?)
On Marks %26amp; Spencer Bread Pudding:
%26quot;Product will be hot after heating.%26quot;
(...and you thought????...)
On packaging for a Rowenta iron:
%26quot;Do not iron clothes on body.%26quot;
(but wouldn%26#039;t this save me more time?)
On Boot%26#039;s Children Cough Medicine:
%26quot;Do not drive a car or operate machinery after taking this medication.%26quot;
(We could do a lot to reduce the rate of construction accidents if we could just get those 5-year-olds with head-colds off those forklifts.)
On Nytol Sleep Aid:
%26quot;Warning: May cause drowsiness.%26quot;
(and...I%26#039;m taking this because???....)
On most brands of Christmas lights:
%26quot;For indoor or outdoor use only.%26quot;
(as opposed to...what?)
On a Japanese food processor:
%26quot;Not to be used for the other use.%26quot;
(Now, somebody out there, help me on this. I%26#039;m a bit curious.)
On Sainsbury%26#039;s peanuts:
%26quot;Warning: contains nuts.%26quot;
(talk about a news flash)
On an American Airlines packet of nuts:
%26quot;Instructions: open packet, eat nuts.%26quot;
(Step 3: maybe, uh...fly Delta?)
On a child%26#039;s superman costume:
%26quot;Wearing of this garment does not enable you to fly.%26quot;
(I don%26#039;t blame the company. I blame the parents for this one.)
On a Swedish chainsaw:
%26quot;Do not attempt to stop chain with your hands or genitals.%26quot;
(Oh my God...was there a lot of this happening somewhere?)
The Stupidity of mankind?
Those were Super! Another Gold Star for ya! Loved the little, one-liners you threw in there! lol.
Reply:ha ha ha ha!!! i love stupid things like this!!!
Reply:ha ha ha funny
thanks for a laugh
Reply:Oh dear! funny though!!
Reply:good one thanks
Reply:Do you ever have time,to actually BUY anything?
Reply:Lol Nice ones!
Reply:fantastic lol.
Reply:hahahaha
Reply:Brilliant
Reply:Which can be found at the ignorant site bored.com i mention that site once a year and a half ago and all hell breaks lose
beauty
On a Sear%26#039;s hairdryer:
....Do not use while sleeping.
(darn, and that%26#039;s the only time I have to work on my hair.)
On a bag of Fritos:
....You could be a winner! No purchase necessary. Details inside.
(the shoplifter special?)
On a bar of Dial soap:
%26quot;Directions: Use like regular soap.%26quot;
(and that would be how???....)
On some Swanson frozen dinners:
%26quot;Serving suggestion: Defrost.%26quot;
(but, it%26#039;s %26quot;just%26quot; a suggestion.)
Tesco%26#039;s Tiramisu dessert (printed on bottom):
%26quot;Do not turn upside down.%26quot;
(well...duh, a bit late, huh?)
On Marks %26amp; Spencer Bread Pudding:
%26quot;Product will be hot after heating.%26quot;
(...and you thought????...)
On packaging for a Rowenta iron:
%26quot;Do not iron clothes on body.%26quot;
(but wouldn%26#039;t this save me more time?)
On Boot%26#039;s Children Cough Medicine:
%26quot;Do not drive a car or operate machinery after taking this medication.%26quot;
(We could do a lot to reduce the rate of construction accidents if we could just get those 5-year-olds with head-colds off those forklifts.)
On Nytol Sleep Aid:
%26quot;Warning: May cause drowsiness.%26quot;
(and...I%26#039;m taking this because???....)
On most brands of Christmas lights:
%26quot;For indoor or outdoor use only.%26quot;
(as opposed to...what?)
On a Japanese food processor:
%26quot;Not to be used for the other use.%26quot;
(Now, somebody out there, help me on this. I%26#039;m a bit curious.)
On Sainsbury%26#039;s peanuts:
%26quot;Warning: contains nuts.%26quot;
(talk about a news flash)
On an American Airlines packet of nuts:
%26quot;Instructions: open packet, eat nuts.%26quot;
(Step 3: maybe, uh...fly Delta?)
On a child%26#039;s superman costume:
%26quot;Wearing of this garment does not enable you to fly.%26quot;
(I don%26#039;t blame the company. I blame the parents for this one.)
On a Swedish chainsaw:
%26quot;Do not attempt to stop chain with your hands or genitals.%26quot;
(Oh my God...was there a lot of this happening somewhere?)
The Stupidity of mankind?
Those were Super! Another Gold Star for ya! Loved the little, one-liners you threw in there! lol.
Reply:ha ha ha ha!!! i love stupid things like this!!!
Reply:ha ha ha funny
thanks for a laugh
Reply:Oh dear! funny though!!
Reply:good one thanks
Reply:Do you ever have time,to actually BUY anything?
Reply:Lol Nice ones!
Reply:fantastic lol.
Reply:hahahaha
Reply:Brilliant
Reply:Which can be found at the ignorant site bored.com i mention that site once a year and a half ago and all hell breaks lose
beauty
Why has USA Congress done this ?
Bush Given Authority To Sexually Torture American Children
The %26quot;horror of the shrieking boys%26quot; gets a rubber stamp from the boot-licking U.S. Congress %26amp; Senate as America officially becomes a dictatorship
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | September 29 2006
Slamming the final nail in the coffin of everything America used to stand for, the boot-licking U.S. Senate last night gave President Bush the legal authority to abduct and sexually mutilate American citizens and American children in the name of the war on terror.
There is nothing in the %26quot;detainee%26quot; legislation that protects American citizens from being kidnapped by their own government and tortured.
Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman states in the L.A. Times, %26quot;The compromise legislation....authorizes the president to seize American citizens as enemy combatants, even if they have never left the United States. And once thrown into military prison, they cannot expect a trial by their peers or any other of the normal protections of the Bill of Rights.%26quot;
Similarly, law Professor Marty Lederman explains: %26quot;this [subsection (ii) of the definition of %26#039;unlawful enemy combatant%26#039;] means that if the Pentagon says you%26#039;re an unlawful enemy combatant -- using whatever criteria they wish -- then as far as Congress, and U.S. law, is concerned, you are one, whether or not you have had any connection to %26#039;hostilities%26#039; at all.%26quot;
We have established that the bill allows the President to define American citizens as enemy combatants. Now let%26#039;s take it one step further.
Before this article is dismissed as another extremist hyperbolic rant, please take a few minutes out of your day to check for yourself the claim that Bush now has not only the legal authority but the active blessings of his own advisors to torture American children.
The backdrop of the Bush administration%26#039;s push to obliterate the Geneva Conventions was encapsulated b y John “torture” Yoo, professor of law at Berkeley, co-author of the PATRIOT Act, author of torture memos and White House advisor.
During a December 1st debate in Chicago with Notre Dame professor and international human rights scholar Doug Cassel, John Yoo gave the green light for the scope of torture to legally include sexual torture of infants.
Cassel: If the president deems that he%26#039;s got to torture somebody, including by crushing the testicles of the person%26#039;s child, there is no law that can stop him?
Yoo: No treaty.
Cassel: Also no law by Congress — that is what you wrote in the August 2002 memo…
Yoo: I think it depends on why the President thinks he needs to do that.
Click here for the audio.
So if the President thinks he needs to order children%26#039;s penises to be put in vices, there is no law that can stop him and after last night%26#039;s vote, the Senate and Congress, exemplified by sicko 16-year-old boy groomer Mark Foley (R-FL) , has graciously provided Bush its full support for kids around the world to be molested in the name of stopping terror.
Yoo%26#039;s comments were made before the passage of the torture legislation last night. Up until that point Bush had merely cited his role as dictator-in-chief as carte-blanche excuse for ordering torture - now his regime have the audacity to openly put it in writing - going one step further than even the Nazis did.
Again, for those who are still deluded into thinking the extent of the %26quot;pressure%26quot; is loud music and cold water being thrown over Johnny Jihad in Ragheadistan, consider for a moment the fact that your own Congress and President who, according to the Constitution, are mandated to serve you, have just legalized abducting your kids from your home and electric shocking their genitals.
Now that the criminals have declared themselves outside of the law does that mean we%26#039;ll see Bush barbecuing babies on the White House lawn? Of course not, but the policy of torturing children in front of their parents has already been signed off on by the Pentagon and enacted under the Copper Green program and it happened at Abu Ghraib .
Women who were arrested with their children were forced to watch their boys being sodomized with chemical glow sticks as the cameras rolled. Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh says that the U.S. government is still withholding the tapes because of the horror of the %26quot;soundtrack of the shrieking boys%26quot; and their mothers begging to be killed in favor of seeing their children raped and tortured.
Your government has just lobbied for and Congress has passed legislation to discard the Geneva Conventions and mandate all this.
Pedophiles nationwide should rejoice - they can comfortably take a stroll down to the local swimming pool, grab whoever they like, drag them home, rape and torture them, and then in their defense cite the U.S. government as an example of how one should conduct themselves.
The bill also retroactively gives Bush, the Neo-Cons or any of their henchmen immunity from war crimes charges dating back to September 11 . Ask yourself why they would be so careful to protect themselves from accusations of war crimes.
Could that possibly be because they are knowingly committing war crimes?
The legislating of torture itself should be a criminal act. All laws that contradict the U.S. Constitution are null and void. It was once a law that black people were slaves.
Only by engaging in civil disobedience and refusing to tolerate or acknowledge the laws of a criminal regime that has greased the skids for sexually torturing kids can we ever have a hope of returning America to its past glory.
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
Why has USA Congress done this ?
not to mention the secrete prisons
Reply:I%26#039;ve been disgusted by US politics for a while, but that makes me really want to puke.
And no sign of any mass protests and I bet those criminals will mostly be re-elected.
That makes me even more sick.
Reply:If you truly believe the United States, under ANY administration, at ANY time, EVER, is going to start %26quot;abducting your kids from your home and electric shocking their genitals%26quot; - kindly renew your passport and move.
There is no place for you or this type of demented paranoia in a civilized society.
Reply:I dare anyone to try to clamp MY penis in a vise. Ain%26#039;t happening if I have any say in it.
On second thought, might be kinda fun. AEN
Reply:If you really want to make this point, then provide links to the legislation which you are dicussing. Until then this is merely a bias opinion.
Reply:It%26#039;s 7;16 eastern time(night) here in America. what itme is it in Iran.
Reply:Ya better hide.They are after YOU.
Reply:And you believe this?
Reply:You should site some links.
knode-devel
The %26quot;horror of the shrieking boys%26quot; gets a rubber stamp from the boot-licking U.S. Congress %26amp; Senate as America officially becomes a dictatorship
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | September 29 2006
Slamming the final nail in the coffin of everything America used to stand for, the boot-licking U.S. Senate last night gave President Bush the legal authority to abduct and sexually mutilate American citizens and American children in the name of the war on terror.
There is nothing in the %26quot;detainee%26quot; legislation that protects American citizens from being kidnapped by their own government and tortured.
Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman states in the L.A. Times, %26quot;The compromise legislation....authorizes the president to seize American citizens as enemy combatants, even if they have never left the United States. And once thrown into military prison, they cannot expect a trial by their peers or any other of the normal protections of the Bill of Rights.%26quot;
Similarly, law Professor Marty Lederman explains: %26quot;this [subsection (ii) of the definition of %26#039;unlawful enemy combatant%26#039;] means that if the Pentagon says you%26#039;re an unlawful enemy combatant -- using whatever criteria they wish -- then as far as Congress, and U.S. law, is concerned, you are one, whether or not you have had any connection to %26#039;hostilities%26#039; at all.%26quot;
We have established that the bill allows the President to define American citizens as enemy combatants. Now let%26#039;s take it one step further.
Before this article is dismissed as another extremist hyperbolic rant, please take a few minutes out of your day to check for yourself the claim that Bush now has not only the legal authority but the active blessings of his own advisors to torture American children.
The backdrop of the Bush administration%26#039;s push to obliterate the Geneva Conventions was encapsulated b y John “torture” Yoo, professor of law at Berkeley, co-author of the PATRIOT Act, author of torture memos and White House advisor.
During a December 1st debate in Chicago with Notre Dame professor and international human rights scholar Doug Cassel, John Yoo gave the green light for the scope of torture to legally include sexual torture of infants.
Cassel: If the president deems that he%26#039;s got to torture somebody, including by crushing the testicles of the person%26#039;s child, there is no law that can stop him?
Yoo: No treaty.
Cassel: Also no law by Congress — that is what you wrote in the August 2002 memo…
Yoo: I think it depends on why the President thinks he needs to do that.
Click here for the audio.
So if the President thinks he needs to order children%26#039;s penises to be put in vices, there is no law that can stop him and after last night%26#039;s vote, the Senate and Congress, exemplified by sicko 16-year-old boy groomer Mark Foley (R-FL) , has graciously provided Bush its full support for kids around the world to be molested in the name of stopping terror.
Yoo%26#039;s comments were made before the passage of the torture legislation last night. Up until that point Bush had merely cited his role as dictator-in-chief as carte-blanche excuse for ordering torture - now his regime have the audacity to openly put it in writing - going one step further than even the Nazis did.
Again, for those who are still deluded into thinking the extent of the %26quot;pressure%26quot; is loud music and cold water being thrown over Johnny Jihad in Ragheadistan, consider for a moment the fact that your own Congress and President who, according to the Constitution, are mandated to serve you, have just legalized abducting your kids from your home and electric shocking their genitals.
Now that the criminals have declared themselves outside of the law does that mean we%26#039;ll see Bush barbecuing babies on the White House lawn? Of course not, but the policy of torturing children in front of their parents has already been signed off on by the Pentagon and enacted under the Copper Green program and it happened at Abu Ghraib .
Women who were arrested with their children were forced to watch their boys being sodomized with chemical glow sticks as the cameras rolled. Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh says that the U.S. government is still withholding the tapes because of the horror of the %26quot;soundtrack of the shrieking boys%26quot; and their mothers begging to be killed in favor of seeing their children raped and tortured.
Your government has just lobbied for and Congress has passed legislation to discard the Geneva Conventions and mandate all this.
Pedophiles nationwide should rejoice - they can comfortably take a stroll down to the local swimming pool, grab whoever they like, drag them home, rape and torture them, and then in their defense cite the U.S. government as an example of how one should conduct themselves.
The bill also retroactively gives Bush, the Neo-Cons or any of their henchmen immunity from war crimes charges dating back to September 11 . Ask yourself why they would be so careful to protect themselves from accusations of war crimes.
Could that possibly be because they are knowingly committing war crimes?
The legislating of torture itself should be a criminal act. All laws that contradict the U.S. Constitution are null and void. It was once a law that black people were slaves.
Only by engaging in civil disobedience and refusing to tolerate or acknowledge the laws of a criminal regime that has greased the skids for sexually torturing kids can we ever have a hope of returning America to its past glory.
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
Why has USA Congress done this ?
not to mention the secrete prisons
Reply:I%26#039;ve been disgusted by US politics for a while, but that makes me really want to puke.
And no sign of any mass protests and I bet those criminals will mostly be re-elected.
That makes me even more sick.
Reply:If you truly believe the United States, under ANY administration, at ANY time, EVER, is going to start %26quot;abducting your kids from your home and electric shocking their genitals%26quot; - kindly renew your passport and move.
There is no place for you or this type of demented paranoia in a civilized society.
Reply:I dare anyone to try to clamp MY penis in a vise. Ain%26#039;t happening if I have any say in it.
On second thought, might be kinda fun. AEN
Reply:If you really want to make this point, then provide links to the legislation which you are dicussing. Until then this is merely a bias opinion.
Reply:It%26#039;s 7;16 eastern time(night) here in America. what itme is it in Iran.
Reply:Ya better hide.They are after YOU.
Reply:And you believe this?
Reply:You should site some links.
knode-devel
What do you Christians think of this ?
Bush Given Authority To Sexually Torture American Children
The %26quot;horror of the shrieking boys%26quot; gets a rubber stamp from the boot-licking U.S. Congress %26amp; Senate as America officially becomes a dictatorship
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | September 29 2006
Slamming the final nail in the coffin of everything America used to stand for, the boot-licking U.S. Senate last night gave President Bush the legal authority to abduct and sexually mutilate American citizens and American children in the name of the war on terror.
There is nothing in the %26quot;detainee%26quot; legislation that protects American citizens from being kidnapped by their own government and tortured.
Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman states in the L.A. Times, %26quot;The compromise legislation....authorizes the president to seize American citizens as enemy combatants, even if they have never left the United States. And once thrown into military prison, they cannot expect a trial by their peers or any other of the normal protections of the Bill of Rights.%26quot;
Similarly, law Professor Marty Lederman explains: %26quot;this [subsection (ii) of the definition of %26#039;unlawful enemy combatant%26#039;] means that if the Pentagon says you%26#039;re an unlawful enemy combatant -- using whatever criteria they wish -- then as far as Congress, and U.S. law, is concerned, you are one, whether or not you have had any connection to %26#039;hostilities%26#039; at all.%26quot;
We have established that the bill allows the President to define American citizens as enemy combatants. Now let%26#039;s take it one step further.
Before this article is dismissed as another extremist hyperbolic rant, please take a few minutes out of your day to check for yourself the claim that Bush now has not only the legal authority but the active blessings of his own advisors to torture American children.
The backdrop of the Bush administration%26#039;s push to obliterate the Geneva Conventions was encapsulated b y John “torture” Yoo, professor of law at Berkeley, co-author of the PATRIOT Act, author of torture memos and White House advisor.
During a December 1st debate in Chicago with Notre Dame professor and international human rights scholar Doug Cassel, John Yoo gave the green light for the scope of torture to legally include sexual torture of infants.
Cassel: If the president deems that he%26#039;s got to torture somebody, including by crushing the testicles of the person%26#039;s child, there is no law that can stop him?
Yoo: No treaty.
Cassel: Also no law by Congress — that is what you wrote in the August 2002 memo…
Yoo: I think it depends on why the President thinks he needs to do that.
Click here for the audio.
So if the President thinks he needs to order children%26#039;s penises to be put in vices, there is no law that can stop him and after last night%26#039;s vote, the Senate and Congress, exemplified by sicko 16-year-old boy groomer Mark Foley (R-FL) , has graciously provided Bush its full support for kids around the world to be molested in the name of stopping terror.
Yoo%26#039;s comments were made before the passage of the torture legislation last night. Up until that point Bush had merely cited his role as dictator-in-chief as carte-blanche excuse for ordering torture - now his regime have the audacity to openly put it in writing - going one step further than even the Nazis did.
Again, for those who are still deluded into thinking the extent of the %26quot;pressure%26quot; is loud music and cold water being thrown over Johnny Jihad in Ragheadistan, consider for a moment the fact that your own Congress and President who, according to the Constitution, are mandated to serve you, have just legalized abducting your kids from your home and electric shocking their genitals.
Now that the criminals have declared themselves outside of the law does that mean we%26#039;ll see Bush barbecuing babies on the White House lawn? Of course not, but the policy of torturing children in front of their parents has already been signed off on by the Pentagon and enacted under the Copper Green program and it happened at Abu Ghraib .
Women who were arrested with their children were forced to watch their boys being sodomized with chemical glow sticks as the cameras rolled. Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh says that the U.S. government is still withholding the tapes because of the horror of the %26quot;soundtrack of the shrieking boys%26quot; and their mothers begging to be killed in favor of seeing their children raped and tortured.
Your government has just lobbied for and Congress has passed legislation to discard the Geneva Conventions and mandate all this.
Pedophiles nationwide should rejoice - they can comfortably take a stroll down to the local swimming pool, grab whoever they like, drag them home, rape and torture them, and then in their defense cite the U.S. government as an example of how one should conduct themselves.
The bill also retroactively gives Bush, the Neo-Cons or any of their henchmen immunity from war crimes charges dating back to September 11 . Ask yourself why they would be so careful to protect themselves from accusations of war crimes.
Could that possibly be because they are knowingly committing war crimes?
The legislating of torture itself should be a criminal act. All laws that contradict the U.S. Constitution are null and void. It was once a law that black people were slaves.
Only by engaging in civil disobedience and refusing to tolerate or acknowledge the laws of a criminal regime that has greased the skids for sexually torturing kids can we ever have a hope of returning America to its past glory.
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
What do you Christians think of this ?
Thanx for the effort but the majority of zombies in the good ol%26#039; US don%26#039;t understand your point.
Reply:Way too much kool-aid for you!
Reply:The article is crap. Is that comment enough?
Reply:Ha..Lemme guess?..Your either Muslim or a Democrat
Reply:Dude, He%26#039;s not Your government and Your children wont be malessed.
Why do you peek your nose in someone-elses soup?
None of your business what they doo.
Tell us something for Your government, where you have a right to tell us about.
Reply:I think you are an idiot.
Reply:You can not make statements like this with out backing them up.
Or are you just another spreader of misinformation? Does the DNC pay your way! Or are you just mentally corrupt as well as morally? The only people that would believe this stuff are mentally challenged any way! You should see a psychiatrist or maybe you have a brain tumor? Oh, I fore got! You have to have brain to have a tumor.
Reply:First, it is way too long for anyone to read. Second, %26quot;planet.com?%26quot; Now THERE%26#039;S a legitimate news source that I sure would trust to tell me the truth--NOT! Third, why do you assume all Christians are the same and there is something bad about it? And, last, this is nothing but incredibly ridiculous and lies.
Reply:I think its crap
Reply:You are either a democrat, or Iranian, or terrorist, or a Muslim.
The authors of your article have not read the bill/law just interpreted it to fit their agenda.
Reply:U GAD IT
Reply:You must be a space alien.This crap is too kooky,even for liberal Earthlings.
Reply:Conspiracy nut lay off the kool-aid.
skin spots
The %26quot;horror of the shrieking boys%26quot; gets a rubber stamp from the boot-licking U.S. Congress %26amp; Senate as America officially becomes a dictatorship
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | September 29 2006
Slamming the final nail in the coffin of everything America used to stand for, the boot-licking U.S. Senate last night gave President Bush the legal authority to abduct and sexually mutilate American citizens and American children in the name of the war on terror.
There is nothing in the %26quot;detainee%26quot; legislation that protects American citizens from being kidnapped by their own government and tortured.
Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman states in the L.A. Times, %26quot;The compromise legislation....authorizes the president to seize American citizens as enemy combatants, even if they have never left the United States. And once thrown into military prison, they cannot expect a trial by their peers or any other of the normal protections of the Bill of Rights.%26quot;
Similarly, law Professor Marty Lederman explains: %26quot;this [subsection (ii) of the definition of %26#039;unlawful enemy combatant%26#039;] means that if the Pentagon says you%26#039;re an unlawful enemy combatant -- using whatever criteria they wish -- then as far as Congress, and U.S. law, is concerned, you are one, whether or not you have had any connection to %26#039;hostilities%26#039; at all.%26quot;
We have established that the bill allows the President to define American citizens as enemy combatants. Now let%26#039;s take it one step further.
Before this article is dismissed as another extremist hyperbolic rant, please take a few minutes out of your day to check for yourself the claim that Bush now has not only the legal authority but the active blessings of his own advisors to torture American children.
The backdrop of the Bush administration%26#039;s push to obliterate the Geneva Conventions was encapsulated b y John “torture” Yoo, professor of law at Berkeley, co-author of the PATRIOT Act, author of torture memos and White House advisor.
During a December 1st debate in Chicago with Notre Dame professor and international human rights scholar Doug Cassel, John Yoo gave the green light for the scope of torture to legally include sexual torture of infants.
Cassel: If the president deems that he%26#039;s got to torture somebody, including by crushing the testicles of the person%26#039;s child, there is no law that can stop him?
Yoo: No treaty.
Cassel: Also no law by Congress — that is what you wrote in the August 2002 memo…
Yoo: I think it depends on why the President thinks he needs to do that.
Click here for the audio.
So if the President thinks he needs to order children%26#039;s penises to be put in vices, there is no law that can stop him and after last night%26#039;s vote, the Senate and Congress, exemplified by sicko 16-year-old boy groomer Mark Foley (R-FL) , has graciously provided Bush its full support for kids around the world to be molested in the name of stopping terror.
Yoo%26#039;s comments were made before the passage of the torture legislation last night. Up until that point Bush had merely cited his role as dictator-in-chief as carte-blanche excuse for ordering torture - now his regime have the audacity to openly put it in writing - going one step further than even the Nazis did.
Again, for those who are still deluded into thinking the extent of the %26quot;pressure%26quot; is loud music and cold water being thrown over Johnny Jihad in Ragheadistan, consider for a moment the fact that your own Congress and President who, according to the Constitution, are mandated to serve you, have just legalized abducting your kids from your home and electric shocking their genitals.
Now that the criminals have declared themselves outside of the law does that mean we%26#039;ll see Bush barbecuing babies on the White House lawn? Of course not, but the policy of torturing children in front of their parents has already been signed off on by the Pentagon and enacted under the Copper Green program and it happened at Abu Ghraib .
Women who were arrested with their children were forced to watch their boys being sodomized with chemical glow sticks as the cameras rolled. Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh says that the U.S. government is still withholding the tapes because of the horror of the %26quot;soundtrack of the shrieking boys%26quot; and their mothers begging to be killed in favor of seeing their children raped and tortured.
Your government has just lobbied for and Congress has passed legislation to discard the Geneva Conventions and mandate all this.
Pedophiles nationwide should rejoice - they can comfortably take a stroll down to the local swimming pool, grab whoever they like, drag them home, rape and torture them, and then in their defense cite the U.S. government as an example of how one should conduct themselves.
The bill also retroactively gives Bush, the Neo-Cons or any of their henchmen immunity from war crimes charges dating back to September 11 . Ask yourself why they would be so careful to protect themselves from accusations of war crimes.
Could that possibly be because they are knowingly committing war crimes?
The legislating of torture itself should be a criminal act. All laws that contradict the U.S. Constitution are null and void. It was once a law that black people were slaves.
Only by engaging in civil disobedience and refusing to tolerate or acknowledge the laws of a criminal regime that has greased the skids for sexually torturing kids can we ever have a hope of returning America to its past glory.
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
What do you Christians think of this ?
Thanx for the effort but the majority of zombies in the good ol%26#039; US don%26#039;t understand your point.
Reply:Way too much kool-aid for you!
Reply:The article is crap. Is that comment enough?
Reply:Ha..Lemme guess?..Your either Muslim or a Democrat
Reply:Dude, He%26#039;s not Your government and Your children wont be malessed.
Why do you peek your nose in someone-elses soup?
None of your business what they doo.
Tell us something for Your government, where you have a right to tell us about.
Reply:I think you are an idiot.
Reply:You can not make statements like this with out backing them up.
Or are you just another spreader of misinformation? Does the DNC pay your way! Or are you just mentally corrupt as well as morally? The only people that would believe this stuff are mentally challenged any way! You should see a psychiatrist or maybe you have a brain tumor? Oh, I fore got! You have to have brain to have a tumor.
Reply:First, it is way too long for anyone to read. Second, %26quot;planet.com?%26quot; Now THERE%26#039;S a legitimate news source that I sure would trust to tell me the truth--NOT! Third, why do you assume all Christians are the same and there is something bad about it? And, last, this is nothing but incredibly ridiculous and lies.
Reply:I think its crap
Reply:You are either a democrat, or Iranian, or terrorist, or a Muslim.
The authors of your article have not read the bill/law just interpreted it to fit their agenda.
Reply:U GAD IT
Reply:You must be a space alien.This crap is too kooky,even for liberal Earthlings.
Reply:Conspiracy nut lay off the kool-aid.
skin spots
Should violent young criminals be punished?
I ask this as, in my city, three thugs of fourteen who broke into a zoo and tortured animals are being let off scot-free by the Children%26#039;s Panel (a pathetic group who should be abolished). Americans have the right idea when it comes to boot camps for yobs as surely violent pre-teens and teens have lost the right to be treated like children when they show they are capable of such vile acts. In these boot camps, not only are inmates punished but they are also given therapy so it%26#039;s the best of both worlds really.
I%26#039;d be interested to know what others think about the UK%26#039;s pathetic criminal justice system that surely makes us a laughing stock at times.
Should violent young criminals be punished?
as an American I think that is the funniest thing in the world
they should be locked up in juvie for that and if it happened in america all of the animal rights activists would be finding way to hunt them down lol
the UK is really pathetic (using your word) when it comes to prosecuting minors...
Reply:I quite agree with you and boot camps seem a good idea but what I have read in the past few weeks even those are to soft for some of them. (3 kids hit a man with a burning plank and then put his unconscious body on the bonfire on Nov 5th.) Boot camps are too good for these morons.
Reply:A have three words. Learn them. Learn their meaning.
A Clockwork Orange
It%26#039;s a book on that line. Children are simply nuts! They can%26#039;t be reformed! It simply comes with age... and if it doesn%26#039;t, then they need imprisonment.
But depend on the nature of the crime, I think that children should be punished to an extent. They definitely need mental evaluations. In that case you presented, a degree of punishment was definitly needed. I%26#039;m no fan of PETA, but I%26#039;m no fan of animals in pain, either.
Reply:just kill em all
Reply:Unless your a thug reading this 99.9999999% of the population should agree with your views. I cannot understand why our schools are not pro-active in dealing with the crimminal element before they reach an age of tragic consequences. I also would add a requirement of our schools and parents to start psychological testing %26amp; profiling to help the future of the youth at risk and the safty of us all. Childhood 3 strikes for violent children would be agreeable to most folks that actually want to do something proactive as well??? Just a few points to ponder???
Reply:It%26#039;s the parents fault. I think they should beat the hell out of the kids and put the parents in prison at hard labor. If that doesn%26#039;t work than we go after the grandparents. Thank you.
Reply:That is pathetic. I say give them a shovel and a bucket and forced to clean up the animals droppings.
Reply:^^^pepole like that should be locked up for good,there not kids,there just phyco
Reply:ima 16 yr old felon....
Reply:I think that they should because they could be doing more bad things if you let them go. They might even kill you. Am I scarying you?
Reply:what do you want to do, reward them?
acne cure
I%26#039;d be interested to know what others think about the UK%26#039;s pathetic criminal justice system that surely makes us a laughing stock at times.
Should violent young criminals be punished?
as an American I think that is the funniest thing in the world
they should be locked up in juvie for that and if it happened in america all of the animal rights activists would be finding way to hunt them down lol
the UK is really pathetic (using your word) when it comes to prosecuting minors...
Reply:I quite agree with you and boot camps seem a good idea but what I have read in the past few weeks even those are to soft for some of them. (3 kids hit a man with a burning plank and then put his unconscious body on the bonfire on Nov 5th.) Boot camps are too good for these morons.
Reply:A have three words. Learn them. Learn their meaning.
A Clockwork Orange
It%26#039;s a book on that line. Children are simply nuts! They can%26#039;t be reformed! It simply comes with age... and if it doesn%26#039;t, then they need imprisonment.
But depend on the nature of the crime, I think that children should be punished to an extent. They definitely need mental evaluations. In that case you presented, a degree of punishment was definitly needed. I%26#039;m no fan of PETA, but I%26#039;m no fan of animals in pain, either.
Reply:just kill em all
Reply:Unless your a thug reading this 99.9999999% of the population should agree with your views. I cannot understand why our schools are not pro-active in dealing with the crimminal element before they reach an age of tragic consequences. I also would add a requirement of our schools and parents to start psychological testing %26amp; profiling to help the future of the youth at risk and the safty of us all. Childhood 3 strikes for violent children would be agreeable to most folks that actually want to do something proactive as well??? Just a few points to ponder???
Reply:It%26#039;s the parents fault. I think they should beat the hell out of the kids and put the parents in prison at hard labor. If that doesn%26#039;t work than we go after the grandparents. Thank you.
Reply:That is pathetic. I say give them a shovel and a bucket and forced to clean up the animals droppings.
Reply:^^^pepole like that should be locked up for good,there not kids,there just phyco
Reply:ima 16 yr old felon....
Reply:I think that they should because they could be doing more bad things if you let them go. They might even kill you. Am I scarying you?
Reply:what do you want to do, reward them?
acne cure
Gasoline in the frying pan (not while cooking...). Can I still use it?
Hey everybody. While I was driving one day, I took a turn too hard and a jerry can with a little petrol in the bottom spilled into a frying pan I had in the car boot. When the car started to smell strongly of gas the next day, I checked the boot and realized there was probably about 15-20 mL of petrol in the frying pan. In my haste to get to work, I pulled it out of the boot and left it outside for 2 days. After I finally brought it inside and washed it vigourously, it still smells like gasoline. Can I still use it? Or has the petrol seeped into the pan somehow to poison me, and my children and my children%26#039;s children? Thanks!
Gasoline in the frying pan (not while cooking...). Can I still use it?
When in doubt throw it out
Reply:Add some cooking oil to pan and heat it , swishing the oil around, this will absorb the smell, dump the oil and dry with kitchen roll, should be OK next time.
Reply:I would try coating it with Dawn dish soap over night then scrubbing it good. Dawn cuts grease and MAY help. You can try the dish washer after that. If it works, you will have to reseason the skillet.
If the smell persists pitch it. Gasoline has probably permiated the skillet %26amp; petrolium products can be bad for your family, but cooking in a skillet with gas in it could be hazzardous to your health.
Reply:it won%26#039;t poison you but will make your food taste like crap!! buy a new pan.
Reply:Man I can buy a GOOD frying pan for way less than one trip to the emergency room. The stress and worry alone about my own health and my children%26#039;s health would far outweigh the cost. I would throw it out and get a new one.
Reply:If you can still smell it then it probably did seep into the pan. Even teflon and silverstone pans are slightly porous. I would toss the pan.
affiliate
Gasoline in the frying pan (not while cooking...). Can I still use it?
When in doubt throw it out
Reply:Add some cooking oil to pan and heat it , swishing the oil around, this will absorb the smell, dump the oil and dry with kitchen roll, should be OK next time.
Reply:I would try coating it with Dawn dish soap over night then scrubbing it good. Dawn cuts grease and MAY help. You can try the dish washer after that. If it works, you will have to reseason the skillet.
If the smell persists pitch it. Gasoline has probably permiated the skillet %26amp; petrolium products can be bad for your family, but cooking in a skillet with gas in it could be hazzardous to your health.
Reply:it won%26#039;t poison you but will make your food taste like crap!! buy a new pan.
Reply:Man I can buy a GOOD frying pan for way less than one trip to the emergency room. The stress and worry alone about my own health and my children%26#039;s health would far outweigh the cost. I would throw it out and get a new one.
Reply:If you can still smell it then it probably did seep into the pan. Even teflon and silverstone pans are slightly porous. I would toss the pan.
affiliate
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)